 |
Faq's |
| |
| (1) Why now? |
| (2) What will it cost? |
| (3) Why so much? |
| (4) How will we pay for it? |
| (5) How much will my tax bill go up? |
| (6) Aren’t libraries obsolete? |
| (7) Why should the town pay? |
| (8) Will operating costs go up? |
| (9) Why a bigger library? |
| (10) What about that auditorium? |
| (11) Why knock down the brick building? |
| (12) Could we build in stages? |
| (13) Madison vs. the Guilford Library? |
| (14) Will it be handicap accessible? |
| (15) How do I get an absentee ballot? |
| |
| Q: Why are we proposing this project during these terrible economic times? |
A: There are basically three reasons why we believe it is a good time to pursue this project when the economy is soft: |
- Construction costs are down. Current project cost estimates are actually lower than they were a year ago.
- Interest rates for Town borrowing are down. Total interest costs for the Town’s 20-year borrowing are projected to be substantially less than they would be in a strong economy with higher interest rates.
- The impact on Madison homeowners’ tax bills will not begin until the 2009-10 budget year, and will be small in the first year of the project. The expanded Library will not be completed until around the beginning of 2011, at which time the economy will look very different than it does today.
|
In sum, Madison will be able to realize lower construction costs and lower interest rates now, reap the benefits of these lower costs throughout the life of the bond financing, and in the process create a new modern library that will enhance downtown for many years to come. |
| Q: How much will this project cost? |
A: The Library has agreed with the Town that it will be responsible for 25% of the total cost, and is asking the Town to provide just 75%. The Town’s portion will be provided from capital bonds, which will allow the cost to be spread out over 20 years, much like a home mortgage. The Referendum on November 4th will ask voters to approve a maximum expenditure by the Town of $13.3 million, repayment of which over the life of the bonds will average just about 25 cents a day for the typical Madison homeowner.
|
| Q: Why does the project cost so much? |
A: This is a public building that will serve Madison for generations and possibly centuries. The project is intended to bring Madison a modernized, updated, and enlarged library for the 21st century. The design of the building has been determined by the needs of Scranton Library to meet the changing nature of services offered by all libraries – more programs aimed at groups of different ages, more access to computer stations, more spaces for local groups to meet, more quiet spaces to read and study. The Scranton project will cost a little more because we want to preserve our 108-year-old original building, and we need to demolish certain inefficient parts of that building as well as five other buildings on Library property. With their unique design and structural requirements, libraries are among the most expensive type of structures to build (even more expensive than schools). |
| Q: How will this get paid for? |
A: The Library has agreed with the Town that it will be responsible for 25% of the total cost, and is asking the Town to provide just 75%. The Town’s portion will be provided from capital bonds, which will allow the cost to be spread out over 20 years, much like a home mortgage. The Referendum on November 4th will ask voters to approve a maximum expenditure by the Town of $13.3 million, repayment of which over the life of the bonds will average just about 25 cents a day for the typical Madison homeowner. |
| Q: How much will this expansion make my tax bill go up? And won’t that cost go up over time? |
A: The bond payments will cost the average homeowner in Madison (home valued at $568,000) about 25 cents per day on average over the life of the Town’s bond financing. This cost of repaying principal and interest can be fixed and will not increase over time The Library project will be coming on stream as the peak indebtedness of the Town’s other projects - such as the Town Campus, Police Station, High School, and Rockland Preserve - is starting to decrease. |
| Q: Aren’t libraries become obsolete in the internet age? |
A: Absolutely not. Nationwide, and especially here in Madison, library use is increasing dramatically. Computers have brought a whole new group of users into the library and our Library’s online services, such as e-newsletters and databases, have increased borrowing and readership. The Scranton Library’s existing computers are so popular that people are restricted to 30 minutes use. The expanded library will have more than 30 public use computers located throughout the facility.
Current studies show that library usage nationwide typically rises faster than the population being served. This is especially true in Madison, where per capita library usage is twice the average of libraries in Connecticut. |
| Q: Why should the Town provide public funds for a building it doesn't even own? |
A: The Scranton Library is, by declaration of the Connecticut State legislature, Madison's designated free public library. The fact that the building is not owned by the town and the employees are not town employees is not unusual in Connecticut. Furthermore, the Town will be protected by a Public-Private Cooperation Agreement, which will stipulate that the ownership of the library premises will transfer to the Town in the unlikely event that the Library ever "goes out of the library business." The Town will have voting representation on the Library Board of Trustees. |
| Q: Won't doubling the size of the building double the ongoing annual operating costs? |
A: No, in fact we project that operating costs will increase by only 15%. There are a number of reasons for that. A major one is that the Library’s primary expense is its staff costs – and thanks to operating efficiencies that will now be possible including self-checkout, only 1 or 2 new employees will be required. In addition, more efficient heating & air conditioning, modern and natural lighting, better insulation, and “green” building techniques will greatly improve operating efficiencies. |
| Q: Why do we need a bigger library, the one we have seems fine? |
A: This requires a longer answer than we have space for (but see other links on this site for more). The simple answer is that a bigger library to meet Madison’s needs is way overdue. The Library is overcrowded. It could do so much more for our Town – if we had the room and a modern design. The children’s room was built in 1965 – for a much smaller population with far smaller expectations about library services. Quiet reading and meeting areas have disappeared to cope with a bigger collection and computers. Modern libraries are less repositories for books (although that function continues), and more about providing space for a wide variety of people activities. The 1989 addition was helpful, but frankly undersized by the time it was built. Necessary cost-cutting and lack of full support by the Town government kept it from being the size that would have met present and long-term future needs.
|
| Q: Aren't we just subsidizing R.J. Julia with our "Auditorium"? |
A: R.J. Julia has been a wonderful addition to downtown Madison and to our community. But our Program Center (which is not in any way fixed-seat auditorium) is designed primarily to provide much needed space for library programs, meeting space for community groups, flexible space for other community events such as lectures and art exhibits, and space for library fundraisers. The few R.J. Julia events that are held at the Library each year are a win-win-win. R.J. sells some books, the Library collects a fee or donations, and the citizens of Madison benefit by being able to hear world famous authors and newsmakers who otherwise would be unlikely to visit our town. |
| Q: Why are we knocking down the brick building? |
A: The brick Hull building is in poor condition with leaky roof and basement. Also it is not code compliant for a library and its mechanical and plumbing systems would have to be replaced. The floors would not line up with the new building. The building is not historically important and is not on the list of historic structures. With its significant structural shortcomings, to incorporate the Hull Building in the expanded library would result in an overall increase in the cost of the project. |
| Q: Couldn't the building be done in stages? |
A: In broad terms, the Library Expansion Project consists of demolishing parts of the existing library and other buildings on the premises, building a new addition that is essentially a single structure, and building a simple Library Program Center at the north end of the property. The only separable construction “stage” might be the Program Center, but since the cost of the Center is only about 5% of the total project, it seems economically inefficient not to incorporate it at the outset. |
| Q: Why is the Scranton Library project so much more expensive than the new Guilford Library? |
A: Bit of background about the Guilford Library project – Three years ago, Guilford voters rejected the initial proposal for a library expansion. The project was scaled back and subsequently won voter approval. In September of this year, Guilford opened its newly expanded library building, built at a cost substantially less than the proposed Madison project, but at a size substantially less than first envisioned.
What are the main differences between our proposal and Guilford’s completed expansion? |
- Guilford’s existing library was built in 1933; ours was built in 1900. Guilford expanded in 1977; we first expanded in 1965 and then built a new wing in 1989. Guilford’s newer construction was more usable and more readily adaptable to modern library services and space requirements.
- Unlike Madison, Guilford’s expansion required no purchase of additional land.
- Guilford’s project did not require any building demolition. Madison will be demolishing 6,200 square feet of the existing library building, plus 5 other structures on the property.
- Guilford added approximately 20,000 square feet of new space. Madison will be adding about 27,000 square feet after taking into account the space lost to demolition. Upon completion, the size of Madison’s expanded library’s finished space will be similar to that of the Guilford library.
- The Guilford Library already had substantial parking. Very little new parking was added. Madison will be creating 59 parking spaces where none exist today.
- Guilford’s expansion began in 2007. Madison’s will commence about two years later, and annual inflation factors will increase actual dollar costs for the same construction. Our construction cost estimates suggest the impact of inflation over this period is about $1.5 million.
- The Town of Guilford has a sizeable Community Center near the center of town, and provides a convenient alternative location for large library programs. Madison has no such facility, making our planned Program Center that much more necessary to meet our large program space needs.
- The new Guilford library is smaller than originally planned. One of the casualties of the Guilford voters’ initial rejection of the project was the loss of its planned basement. Not only was valuable storage and expansion space lost, but essential building mechanical systems are now located on the first floor, significantly reducing usable library services space.
|
| Q: Will the expanded Library be handicap accessible? |
A: Yes! The main entrances will be handicap accessible, as will all areas of the Library. That is a big improvement over the many deficiencies in the current building, which was built before the ADA went into place. Perhaps the biggest improvement for the disabled, the elderly, and parents with young children will be the drive-up book-drop and on-site parking. |
| Q: I will be out of town November 4 – how can I get an absentee ballot? |
A: You can get an absentee ballot in person at Town Hall, by phone (203) 245-5672, or online
at http://madisonct.org/Clerk/clerkregis.htm. Note that non-residents who pay at least $1000 in Madison taxes are eligible to vote on this referendum issue (and you can do it in person or by absentee ballot). |
| |